History of Titanium | Grades and Sources of Titanium | 3-2.5 Tubing Comparison
Resiliency, Flexibility & Fatigue | Titanium Use & Abuse
Ovalizing and Tapering Tubes | Engineering Principles of Butting Tubes
Tapering vs. Butting | Welding | Anodizing
Future of Titanium | Glossary
3-2.5 Ti Comparison with Other Materials
Titanium Parts

3-2.5 Ti Comparison with Other Materials

Steel | Aluminum | Metal-Matrix Composites
Titanium Metal Matrix Composites | Beryllium
Carbon Fiber | Carbon Wrapped Titanium and Aluminum
Honeycomb Reinforced Titanium

Titanium Metal Matrix Composites

There are very few titanium-based MMCs in current production, with only two basic types of matrices. One, intermetallic-matrix composite (IMC), uses continuous fiber. The other is formed from titanium carbide particulates. Both have been developed primarily for high-temperature applications, as in engine components and skins for military aircraft.

IMCs are formed from a series of titanium-aluminide foils consolidated with boron-coated silicon carbide continuous fibers. With a starting price of $2000-3000 per pound, it is unlikely they will soon find applications in the bicycle field. Interestingly, raw ingots of titanium cost only $10-12 per pound, so the processing costs to create IMCs are obviously formidable.

Titanium carbide MMCs present similar cost issues. They also suffer from a severe loss of ductility which arises from the induction of carbon into titanium.

Titanium-aluminides are another newly publicized group of aerospace alloys. Strictly speaking, these are not MMCs, but they do boast very high strength and good resistance to loss of mechanical properties at high temperatures. However, they suffer from abysmal ductility at room temperature and exorbitant cost. The ductility issue may soon be resolved; cost, however is unlikely to drop within the foreseeable future.


© Merlin Metalworks 2003. All rights reserved.